Flint toxic water tragedy points directly to Michigan Gov. Snyder

pepoluan:

teal-deer:

pipistrellus:

ameliacgormley:

ameliacgormley:

Transcribing starting after some lead-in stuff not relating to the story:

Even if you know nothing else about how the USA is governed, you know that we’re a representative democracy, right? We elect our leaders at the federal level, the state level, the local level. We hold elections. The people who win the elections because they get the most votes, those people get put in charge of government. That’s the way it works.

Except in the one place where they decided to not do it that way anymore. And that place is in Michigan.

Republican Governor Rick Snyder, at the start of his first term as governor, he signed legislation that lets him OVERTURN ELECTIONS, basically wherever he wants to. Yeah, you can still vote for your neighbor or your school board member or whatever, but if Rick Snyder doesn’t like what you decided in your little election, then he has the power to step in. The state can step in and effectively VOID LOCAL ELECTION RESULTS. They can take your elected mayor or your elected city council or your elected school board and STRIP THEM OF THEIR POWER and instead install someone of the governor’s choosing to run to run things solo. By fiat. Answering to no one other than the governor.

That’s kind of a remarkable idea, right? This idea that if your town needs fixing somehow, if something’s wrong in your town, democracy is not going to be part of the solution, it’s not going to be the way you solve that problem. Democracy is the problem. Democracy has to be gotten rid of if we’re going to fix things in Michigan towns and cities.

Governor Rick Snyder knows best, so he’s going to sweep away your elected officials and install someone to run your town. To fix it without pesky democracy or voters electing people getting in the way.

It’s such a radical idea. It’s a radical idea, let alone a thing to go through with and do. I still almost can’t believe it’s real all these years after we started covering it. But very quietly, this is the radical thing that Michigan has started doing. It’s been going on for a few years now. Rick Snyder is in his second term as governor now. 

It’s been going on long enough now that we can see some of how it works. Turns out, with a few exceptions, towns and school boards who get put under this “emergency management state oversight”, turns out in most cases, THEY NEVER REALLY COME OUT OF IT AGAIN.

I mean, in theory, the idea is to hit “pause” on democracy, so “real work can get done fixing places”, and then democracy can un-pause and start up again in those places once these problems have been fixed.

That’s the theoretical idea. That has not been the way in most places that it has worked. PLACES UNDER EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT JUST STAY UNDER EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT. They just stay broken, and therefore the democratic form of government just doesn’t get switched back on in those places. 

That’s mostly how it works.

And, it turns out we can now say, having one non-elected overseer making basically autocratic, solo, personal decisions by fiat, we now know that is a form of governance that leads to, in Michigan’s case, some notorious consequences. 

Like, for example, when the emergency manager of the school district in Detroit moves to close down that cities only school for pregnant girls and young mothers. And when the pregnant girls and young mothers protested, police ended up dragging them bodily from the building.

Or when they emergency manager in Pontiac, MI sold the Silverdome for pennies on the dollar to a company that then let the roof cave in.

Or when the emergency manager for the City of Detroit shut off the water to thousands of inhabited homes. The outrage and the outcry and the flat-out desperation of denying people drinking water, that got so loud that the people of Detroit were heard by the United Nations. Special Reporters from the UN were dispatched to study the situation as a world-class, international human rights violation.

Well now here’s another one. And this one is just astonishing and you know what? It is not a local story. It is a story about truly, unbelievably reckless radicalism in our country. A story about which it is starting to become inconceivable that nobody has gone to jail or been impeached or recalled from office.

This is the subject of our special report tonight, and this is how it starts.

This is another one of these orders by an emergency manager. You’ll see this one is dated June, 2013.

See, right up at the top there?” By the Emergency Manager.” Hire an engineering firm to get the town ready for using “the Flint River as a primary drinking water source.”

At the time, the state-appointed ONE MAN GOVERNMENT for Flint, MI, the state-appointed “emergency manager” was trying to carry out a plan that the city council had voted for back in the day, which was to try to save money by having Flint no longer buy its drinking water from Detroit. They had always bought water from Detroit but it was expensive, and they decided that Flint was broke, they needed to save money, they needed to get a better deal for Flint, and so they wanted to use a new water system, be part of a new water system that was still under construction.

In the meantime, while that new water system was still under construction, the city of Flint had a choice to make. They could make some sort of short-term deal with Detroit, which the emergency manager said was too expensive, or they could MacGyver some kind of solution for where they would get their water now that they were quitting Detroit but the new system wasn’t ready. They needed something to bridge between getting out of Detroit and getting into that new system.

Flint’s emergency manager decided NOT to try to work something out with Detroit, but instead they went with Option B. They decided to MacGyver it. He signed that order, that June 2013 order, for Flint to get ready to use the Flint River as a primary drinking water source for at least a couple of years.

A few months after that, April 2014, with Flint being run by yet another “emergency manager” Flint unhooked itself from Detroit’s water and started drinking from the mighty, mighty Flint River. The following month that emergency manager in Flint decided to sell the pipe between Flint and Detroit.

So if anything went wrong with this new MacGyver’ed solution of getting the water from the river, well now there was no going back. The emergency manager sold off–literally–the pipe that allowed them to go back to Detroit water if for any reason they needed to. He basically sold the eject button. So Flint was committed to drinking from the river. This idea they’d come up with. 

The Detroit water, the water they used to be on, that was water from the Great Lakes. The water they were switching to was river water from the Flint River. And if you talk to people who know about this stuff, they’ll tell you you do not switch from drinking lake water to drinking river water as Flint did without taking certain precautions.

River water has a different chemical balance, which basically boils down to rivers being saltier than big lakes and that makes river water more corrosive. So you have to take steps to basically keep river water from EATING THE OLD PIPES, which are HELD TOGETHER WITH LEAD SOLDERING. If you let the untreated, corrosive, salty river water eat the old pipes, the lead leaches out of those pipes and gets into the water.

And lead in the water makes people really, really sick. There’s no level of lead in the water that is considered safe. But if you take in way too much lead, it’s rashes and skin lesions and hair loss and also permanent neurological damage.

Particularly if you’re exposed as a kid. It can lead to lowered IQ, emotional problems, behavioral problems. The works.

It’s not that you should never use river water for drinking water. Plenty of places do. You just have to do this one thing. You just have to do it safely. You have to treat the water first so it doesn’t corrode the pipes.

We now know that the State of Michigan, the Snyder administration, TOLD FLINT IT WAS OKAY TO SWITCH TO THAT NEW WATER SOURCE WITHOUT THE ANTI-CORROSION TREATMENT.

And so they did. They just made the switch.

And first came reports that the new water smelled bad. It stung in the shower. In some homes, if you poured it in the tap, it came out rusty-colored, or it came out looking like maybe it was light beer.

Next came news that a local General Motors plant was having problems with the new water. It was corroding the engine parts built at that new factory. GM started bringing in semi-trucks full of water to use at their plant. They knew they had to get Flint’s terrible new water away from their car parts.

Meanwhile the state, the Rick Snyder administration, the state environmental agency started to get in test results showing that the level of lead in Flint water was rising. It had started at six parts per billion. Within six months that had nearly doubled. To 11 parts per billion.

Around the same time, somebody leaked a copy of an EPA memo warning that some very very high lead levels were showing up in Flint water samples. When that EPA memo started making headlines, the State of Michigan denounced the EPA worker who wrote it as a “rogue employee.

So, the Snyder administration knows that lead levels are rising. That EPA report shows very high, very worrying lead levels in some samples from some Flint homes.

The Rick Snyder administration at the time had an answer for an increasingly worried public who was looking at this stuff going on and starting to realize there might be a problem. And the Snyder administrations message to an increasingly worried public was: “Relax, people. Jeez.”

[Recording of radio interview] “Let me start here. Anyone who is concerned about lead in the drinking water in Flint can, can relax. There is no broad problem right now that we’ve seen with lead in the drinking water in Flint.–Brad Wurfel, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality”[End radio interview.]

So that was the word from the Rick Snyder administration in July. Literally “relax. There’s no broad problem that we have seen with lead in the drinking water in Flint.”

Turns out, there WAS a broad problem with the drinking water in Flint.

And the Snyder administration so obviously not caring about it spurred other people to action when they saw that the state did not care.

A MacArthur Genius Award-winning drinking water expert drove 15 straight hours from Virginia Tech to start testing Flint’s water. When he got the results, he went back to Flint and held a press conference on the lawn in front of City Hall to show Flint’s water eating through an iron nail. He told the people of Flint do not drink this water.

A local doctor started studying blood samples from kids in Flint. Her results were scary and stunning. The proportion of kids with elevated lead in their blood was nearly double what it had been before the town switched its water source. Just in a matter of a few months. In some neighborhoods, the danger had tripled, not doubled.

The first guy, the professor? Says the Snyder administration dismissed him as basically a huckster when he presented the results of his testing. The state described him as a magician who pulls the same rabbit out of a hat wherever he goes.

The Flint doctor who tries to tell them that Flint kids were getting lead poisoning? The Snyder administration told people not to believe her. They said that doctor’s results were spliced and diced. And in any case, the Snyder administration said those results were not related to the water supply. 

So relax, people! Drink you water! Six glasses a day, they say.

The Snyder administration held that line in public until finally they could not hold that line any more. And then finally, after Flint kids had been drinking this poisonous water for seventeen months, in late September Governor Rick Snyder conceded that maybe possibly lead might be a problem in Flint, saying for the first time, “it appears that lead levels could be higher, or have increased” since the town switched to river water. There are “probably things that weren’t fully understood when the switch was made.”

You think? You think maybe some things went a little cockeyed here? And now the kids who grew up in Flint are going to have to deal with it the rest of their lives? With points irreversibly shaved off their IQs and learning disabilities and behavioral problems? Irreversibly, for their whole lives. You think maybe somebody didn’t think this thing through?

“It appears?”

On Monday, this week, the mayor of Flint, MI just personally declared a state of emergency. A state of man-made emergency, she called it, in Flint. Saying even now that the governor is acknowledging, finally, that what these emergency managers decided and what his state agencies did, now that he’s acknowledging that that might be a problem here, the fixing of this problem is a matter that needs more help than anyone wants to count on Rick Snyder to be able to give.

If you want to know where things stand now, reporters asked Governor Snyder again yesterday whether his administration is ready to help the kids who quite literally have been poisoned because of his administration in Flint. Watch this. This is just amazing:

[Reporter] “Representative Dan Kildy has called saying, looking down the road, we’re going to be needing more state resources and more federal resources to be able to help the children who might have been affected by this. Do you agree that the state will have to kick in some kind of money somewhere down the line?”

[Snyder] “Well, again, we’ve already made major contributions. Let’s get the facts, let’s keep working this, and let’s remember, um, water isn’t the only sources of lead and we need to be sure we’re encouraging people to look at other places that could create a threat.”

[Rachel Maddow] Let’s make sure we encourage people to look at anything that is not the giant catastrophe that just happened on my watch in Flint MI.

Governor, the water in Flint MI has been poisoned. And this isn’t like–let me just say here for a second, I think the resistance to this being seen as a national story is that people think of lead as being a long-term infrastructure problem. Like, “ah, things went bad in that old city that needs work.”  

This is like, if you want to make an analogy to personal health? This is not like something finally coming due after you’ve had bad diet and no exercise for twenty years. This is the personal health equivalent of having been shot. This is not something that went bad over a long period of time. They flipped a switch to turn off one spigot last April and turned on a different spigot, and the spigot they turned on poisoned the kids. Those kids have been poisoned by a policy decision. All at once. The town has been poisoned.

Under your watch, Governor. Through the actions and inactions of people who report to you and the people you appointed. The emergency manager who signed that initial order to get the town ready for drinking from the river? He reported directly to Governor Snyder and to no one else. The emergency manager who sold the pipeline that should have been the escape hatch? He reported directly to Governor Snyder and no one else. The agency that did not tell Flint how to do this safely and who ignored the fast-rising lead levels in Flint’s water and disparaged first the EPA whistleblower and then the professor and then the local doctor who only wanted to help? That agency reported to and continues to report only to Rick Snyder, the Governor of Michigan.

And now Governor Snyder is like, “well, I guess we could try to do a little bit more to help you, but you know we’ve done a lot, and let’s not get ahead of ourselves, how about a task force? How about I appoint someone with a lot of experience in PR? Which Governor Snyder did this week as part of his response to this crisis. He appointed a brand new, state-paid communications professional to handle this.

This month, in Lansing, a local pastor tried to get a petition approved for recalling Governor Snyder from office. Because of this man-made disaster. Look at this, this petition, look at it. It’s a handwritten thing. Twice now he has tried with a hand-written petition to recall the governor for decisions made by him and his appointees and his administration related to this scandal. His petition has been rejected on technical grounds. For instance, Governor Snyder’s private attorney argues that the recall petition is not timely because Flint switched to the river water that poisoned the town back in the governor’s first term. And now it’s the governor’s second term and so you gotta let those bygones be bygones. You can’t recall him for that. According to Rick Snyder’s lawyers, what’s done is done. Settled. Nobody is accountable, certainly nobody in the governor’s office and certainly not the governor.

Mr. Snyder did manage to cobble together enough money to switch Flint back onto Detroit water for now, even though they sold the pipe. In Flint, though? Remember what this problem is, technically. Corrosion by that river water that came through, right? The pipes are still, in Flint, all scoured out by the untreated river water. Who knows how long they’re going to keep leaching lead?

Is Flint habitable anymore? Really? Michigan made the decisionwith Rick Snyder

a few years ago

to do something very, very radical to the way we govern ourselves as Americans, something nobody else has done.

Now we’re getting in the first results of what they have done. I did not expect those would have to be blood test results from kids, but that’s what they are, that’s what Rick Snyder did.

***

What happened in Flint is an unmitigated tragedy. But what terrifies me is that it was allowed to happen. Snyder unilaterally gave himself the power to throw democratic process out the window. If one man has the power to void election results and appoint someone who hasn’t been elected, how do we keep cronyism in check? How are we to keep these unaccountable appointees from skimming off the top? From hiring substandard contractors who cut corners–like, say, doing risk analysis before switching water sources and treating the water?

This is what Republicans stand for, people. This is what Republican leadership will get us. This is their definition of small government.

Never forget that.

Reblogging because I included the transcription.

rick snyder is the worst thing thats happened to michigan like possibly ever

Holy fuck this is horrifying

This is the story of a backwater country, right?

Flint toxic water tragedy points directly to Michigan Gov. Snyder

vastderp:

ellie5192:

postcardsfromspace:

taikonaut:

medusamori:

terrasigillata:

judeoceltische:

cupidsbower:

sidneyia:

glorious-spoon:

shinelikethunder:

glorious-spoon:

sidneyia:

I realize most people on here are too young to remember the Bush years but when you guys frame your SJ posts as “you hate[x]!!! why do you hate [x]???” it sounds an awful lot like how Bush supporters would scream WHY DO YOU HATE AMERICA???? whenever anybody would criticize the president. 

So that’s something to consider if you want to reach people over 25. Because most of us have an extremely negative conditioned response to that type of rhetoric.

Yeah.

There’s a surprisingly sharp generation gap on Tumblr–when I first got on the site in 2011 it was between high-school age and college age, but I don’t think it’s defined primarily by life stage or maturity level, because it’s tracked steadily upward ever since. Anecdotally, right now the split seems to be centered around age 23, plus or minus a couple of years on either side, which corresponds roughly to the birth years 1990-1994. My hypothesis for the generation gap boils down to “how old were you on September 11, 2001?” Those solidly on the older side of the gap were at least vaguely aware of a pre-9/11 political landscape, witnessed how disruptive the first term of the Bush administration was, and have a visceral reaction anything that smacks of neoconservatism or Religious Right propaganda. Those on the younger side attained political awareness in a world where the changes wrought by the Bush administration were the new normal, and their right-wing bogeyman uses Tea Party and GamerGate rhetoric.

So for the record, Bush-era “innovations” that unnerve the FUCK out of people on the older side of the generation gap:

– Casual acceptance of fear as an excuse for hatred and pre-emptive retaliation

– An “ends justify the means” approach to stamping out the slightest trace of vulnerability, no matter how repressive the means, or how slight or unlikely the potential harm

– “If you’re not marching in lockstep with us, you’re one of THEM, why do you hate all that’s good and noble?” / “Dissent and safeguards against the abuse of power just give aid and comfort to the enemy” / “Don’t you SEE that insisting that the protections of civil society apply to THOSE PEOPLE is just going to GET OUR PEOPLE HURT, YOU’RE HURTING PEOPLE YOU MONSTER”

– Anything that smacks of religious-fundamentalist logic or rhetoric

These things are not normal. These things are not how just societies are built. They are the hot water that an entire generation of lobsters has been raised to swim in without noticing. The undercurrents in the internet movement calling itself Social Justice that disturb the older generation are, essentially, the dirty tactics of the Bush administration and its unholy marriage of neocons and fundies–rebranded with a new set of acceptable targets, but with the tactics themselves unquestioned. Are they the younger generation’s fault? Fuck no. They’re what happens when the most culturally and politically powerful nation on Earth tries to pretend it’s moved on from the Bush years, but without ever having confronted the devastation those tactics left in their wake, dismantled the self-sustaining fear-and-repression machine, or held the perpetrators accountable for their officially-sanctioned torture, shredding of civil liberties, and thinly-justified wars of aggression.

So if I were to do the annoying geezer thing (at the ripe old age of 27) and Address The Youth, I guess what I’d say isn’t just that most people over 25 get an overwhelming urge to throw up in their mouths at the slightest sign you’re playing “but why do you hate freedom” Mad Libs. (Although that’s true.) It’s more than that. It’s that “why do you hate [x]???” belongs to an entire toolbox of fear/attack, ingroup/outgroup, and absolutist tactics that we’ve left lying out without bothering to re-affix the giant warning labels that they aren’t normal, or necessary, or even effective over the long term, however tempting they may be for a quick fix. And that it’s okay to refrain from using them.

The bad guys will not win if you ease off the attack a little and give your opponents room to tell you where they’re coming from. Opening yourself up to argument-counterargument with Bad, Unacceptable, Forbidden ideas is a form of vulnerability, but finding and evaluating the weak spots in your beliefs ultimately strengthens them and strengthens your ability to win people over to your side. Doubling down on the repeated assertions that you shouldn’t even have to argue and that disagreement is harmful or immoral is an alluring way to get what you want in the short term, but it produces superficial compliance out of fear rather than genuine agreement, and the backlash it causes is ultimately more dangerous than the vulnerability of opening yourself to disagreement. And it blinds you to the possibility that you may not be entirely in the right. This isn’t some MRA sneak attack to manipulate you into ceding ground. This is how discussion normally works in a functional society. You have been handed a dysfunctional, toxic system for exchanging ideas, in online SJ as well as in wider politics–and no, it’s not normal or effective, and no, you do not have to buy into that system’s claims that it’s the only thing standing between the innocent and an orgy of destruction and victimization. 

The strangest thing about this is that I would not consider myself particularly old (does anyone?) but I was in my late teens on 9/11, and yeah. This is exactly what I find unnerving about the approach of some younger people to SJ issues. For a long time I just put it down to (im)maturity, but I’m really starting to think that there’s something fundamentally toxic and broken about the way our country has been approaching these things for the last 15 years or so. That kind of black and white, ‘if your fave is problematic then they’re basically the antichrist’ thinking that demonizes and squashes any kind of disagreement is really unhealthy, and it’s something that is learned.

Same, I’m 30, married to someone older than me, and we have a lot of friends in their 40s/50s. People I encounter on a regular basis comment on what a “baby” I am.  I was 15 on 9/11. I’m not like. Ancient. But there is a definitely a difference between how people my age discuss issues versus how younger folks discuss them. Neons have really done a number on out ability to talk about stuff. 

This would explain a lot about how fandom conversations have been going down recently. The absolute us/them nature of some of them, and the way SJ tools are used to bully people in order to win an argument.

I thought it was largely to do with Tumblr being a poor design for actual conversation, but this makes more sense, given the patterns I’ve seen.

I…think that most of the people on Tumblr will get older. The no holds barred, right or wrong, FUCK YOU surety is part of being a teenager. Then you get it knocked out of you and learn to nuance. Both phases have value. What I’m saying here is that I think it’s more developmental than generational.

I don’t understand what this has to do with 9/11

9/11 largely serves as a convenient symbolic marker for a severe shift in public discourse– I was 14 when it happened and I very clearly remember the before-times socially and politically and the after, when there really was a huge public shift in the way things were discussed, and how people in my age group and a  little younger responded to things like “national tragedies,” “us vs them,” good vs evil" etc?

Kind of dumb example but I think is illustrative– when we were 12/13, the year before 9/11, a group of kids went to DC and New York and visited all the war memorials. People whose uncles and fathers had fought in Vietnam visited the wall and Arlington, were moved, went through all the ceremonial stuff, but not to the point of dramatic hysterics. Maybe two/three years after 9/11, many of the same kids went to Pearl Harbor while we were on tour in Hawaii and everything was prefaced with this really jingoistic Us Vs Them language, and half the group spent the entire time bawling performatively. There were also a lot of recriminations for not engaging in the theatrics, because it wasn’t showing Proper Respect to Our National Heroes, none of whom any of these kids could have known because they all died in 1941.

My little brother is only 22 months younger than me but he doesn’t really remember the day at all, and doesn’t really remember anything about the politics or big news stories from beforehand, whereas I very clearly remember having an opinion about the 1996 election and my The Talk with my mom was kicked off because of the Clinton impeachment. 9/11 kicked off a lot of the worst of what we see in American political discourse today, and so people who don’t remember it as clearly or the time before may have different outlooks, especially in the States.

On the one hand this is a fairly enlightening take on the somewhat rabid state of what passes for online discourse these days.

On t’other, remind me again why we haven’t built a wall around America yet?

This is a fascinating conversation. I think there’s more to it than this–the way digital social spaces intersect with social phenomena informs the discourse hugely–but there’s a lot here worth considering.

It also occurs to me that a lot of us who were old enough not only to remember 9/11, but also to be aware of the shift in public discourse around it, are also old enough to remember the Cold War, or at least its last lingering throes. 

I’m 32, and I grew up with parents who were very active in the nuclear freeze movement. One of the fundamental truths I absorbed very early was that us-vs.-them absolutism and refusal to compromise and engage in good faith with ideological opponents wasn’t just stupid; it was deadly–potentially on a massive, global scale. I remember projects to hook U.S. kids up with penpals in the U.S.S.R. in hopes that we’d learn to see each other as people and so maybe not end life on fucking Earth if by some miracle our parents didn’t beat us to the punch.

And that approach was critical to the peace movement in general: humanizing the enemy. Trying to find points of connection; to learn to disagree humanely. That was a core, fundamental value of my childhood, in ways that were very closely and directly linked to the contemporary geopolitical scene; and they’re philosophies that continue to profoundly inform and steer my discourse and my approach to conflict–personal and political–as an adult.

Which is part of what scares the shit out of me about the discourse I see online, especially from the left: it’s all about radical dehumanization. I see people who are ostensibly on my side casually call other human beings trash or garbage or worthless. Scorch earth. Go to unbelievable lengths to justify NEVER engaging. Meet overtures to peace or steps toward change with spectacular cruelty.

I mean, I’ve seen variations on this exchange more times than I can count:

“[group x] are people, too.”

“No, they’re not.”

And then people LOL, and I don’t even know where to start, because–No. You do not say that. You do not EVER say that. EVER.

And I can so easily imagine how terrifying it must be to grow up in that–to be 15 or 16 or 17 and just becoming, and trying to find and place and grow into yourself in that kind of violence, and–

–to paraphrase someone profoundly and complexly flawed and still a person worth paraphrasing: Remember, babies, you gotta be kind.

I’m right on the tail end of the pre-9/11 babies and all this is so true to me. I was 9 when it happened, but had literally just travelled to the States and was becoming aware of the world at that age – learning about difference in cultures now that I had seen another country. And out of nowhere I noticed a HUGE change in the discourse (at least on reflection) that society used to explain difference and talk about Us and Them.
I grew up in a policing family, so personal and community safety was always at the forefront, but suddenly everyone was AFRAID and I had no true idea why. Why do we have to take our shoes off to go on the plane now? Why do the pretty buildings in town have more security? Why do visiting diplomats need escorting submarines with nuclear weapons ready to launch at aggressors?
We watched the morning news the day after 9/11 and saw the replay of the twin towers collapsing and my mum bawled her eyes out (it was one of those ‘you always remember where you were’ moments), and after that everyone was different. 

At my (predominantly Irish/Italian/Greek Catholic) primary school we got a new principal the following year named Mr Lane (the first non-Nun principal in the school’s history), and kids asked if he was Asian. The Australian-centric fears around the “Asian Invasion” were reignited by the anti-Them rhetoric that was floating around in their parent’s living rooms. 

Also to consider, this language change was happening just as the internet was becoming a commonplace thing in people’s homes, and kids were more readily logging on, so this whole ‘generational gap’ thing is compounded by the technological innovation of the day, which allowed it to flourish and expand rapidly, often without the filtration of parental input or supervision. 

This generation actually has more in common with their grandparents (or great-grandparents, depending on the age) – the Red under the bed scaremongers – than with the generation in between who saw the clusterfuck of the Cold War and Vietnam and decided that acceptance was a better policy.

People who don’t remember 911 have no experience of watching how its shock and anger were steered by cynical oligarchy to wrath and predation. how the powerful latched on to the helplessness and terrified us into paranoid brutality, and how we went along with it as a nation because people were so fucking afraid.

people who do remember 911 watched the good guys become monsters, and there is no formula and no magic political stance that can safeguard against hat happening again. and again. and again. when i hear “X deserve(s) die unfollow if you don’ agree” from people who seemed, before, to be on my side, i don’t care that it’s only a teeny tiny miniscule example of fascism. to borrow a buzzword that ruins plenty of lives in moral, compassionate America, i have zero fucking tolerance for that shit. on any scale.

you had to be there.

and thanks to humanity’s tendency to “learn its lesson” about the evils of his or that political belief, only to restart the cycle, you will be, eventually.

4 Sacred Native American Sites In Danger Of Being Destroyed By Corporations

idlenomorewisconsin:

The days where Native American tribes were forced to give up their land are far from over.

Here are four sacred Native American sites in danger of being destroyed in the name of corporate greed.

Badger-Two Medicine

The Blackfeet Tribe calls the land of Badger-Two Medicine “the Backbone of the World,” the place where the story of their people began. But now the mineral-rich land, located in modern day Michigan, is in danger of being drilled for oil.

Solenext, LCC, the last of the 47 leaseholders of the land, filed a lawsuit so that drilling could begin. Earl Old Person, a member of the Blackfeet Tribal Business Council since 1954, is fighting to preserve what he calls “an altar to the Blackfeet Confederacy.” He wrote a letter to Obama urging the president to intervene.

Oak Flat

After lawmakers slipped in a clause in the National Defense Authorization Act that swapped 2,400 acres of copper-containing land for 5,300 acres of substandard land, the San Carlos Apache tribe has been fighting to preserve Oak Flat.

The land is located in Arizona and contains Apache Leap, a place where 75 Apache men, women, and children were massacred.

In response to the controversy, the international mining corporation, Resolution Mining Inc., said that the mine could be a good thing because it could employ Native Americans.

The Black Hills

The Lakota, Nakota, and Dakota peoples, who suffer from systemic poverty, turned down $1.5 billion offered to them for the Black Hills, land the Keystone XL Pipeline would intersect. That’s how much this land matters to them.

Rosebud Sioux Tribe President Cyril Scott has called the Keystone XL Pipeline “an act of war.”

The Osage Mounds

The Chahokian Mounds are the artifacts of an ancient, complex civilization. The modern Osage consider themselves to be descendants of these mound builders, the architects of the most important city to the Mississippians.

But the NFL’S St. Louis Rams are planning on paving over what’s left of it to build a new stadium. Indian Country Today Media Network reports that the project has a $1 billion price tag and that its construction is still in its early development.

Hopefully the mound can still be salvaged.

H/T: St. Louis Public Radio, Indian Country Today Media Network

Read more:

http://bluenationreview.com/4-sacred-native-american-sites-in-danger-of-being-destroyed-by-corporations/#ixzz3aQiDNaF6

4 Sacred Native American Sites In Danger Of Being Destroyed By Corporations

slayingbells:

slayingbells:

slayingbells:

slayingbells:

my people are dying. assyrians are undergoing another genocide – and honestly the past genocide never really ended. over a century of persecution. a hundred years of massacres, of our land being stolen, of systematic oppression and targeting. two thirds of our global population has been murdered in the last one hundred years. the majority of our population now lives outside of our native homeland in iraq. most governments do not officially recognise that we exist, or our right to our homeland of ancient assyria. it has taken tragedy of horrific proportions for us to gain any recognition. we continue to be erased – left completely unmentioned in many articles and discussions even as our culture and heritage is actively being destroyed, even as our people die protecting what is left; or mentioned only as ‘iraqi christians’  and so with our ethnic identity ignored we are reduced to pawns in racist and islamophobic wars and discussions by the west and daesh. yes we as a community are christian, but that is not all we are. we are a distinct and ancient ethnic group and whilst daesh and western christians want to call this a religious war, and indeed daesh’s general actions are the result of exported waahabism, this is not a religious war for us and i will not allow my people to be used as tools to spread further racism against various middle eastern ethnic groups and islamophobia (or antisemitism). we are middle eastern. we are poc. the genocide against us is ethnic in origin and continuing many years of attempted ethnic cleansing against us. we are native, indigenous to the land and yet even as we make up only an estimated 3% of iraq’s current population assyrians make up to 40% of the emmigrating population. there are large diaspora communities in such unstable countries as syria. many of the older generation have resigned themselves sadly to losing what is left of their culture and heritage, calling iraq history. even as we fight and hold onto hope, our screams could be the death rattle of our people.

we are using our voices, are you listening?

since i first posted this several more monuments to assyrian genocide have been vandalised in several different countries, and tens more assyrians have been killed – included two important community leaders and officials. our people continue to be murdered, chased from our land, our towns and villages destroyed, our history and culture our heritage erased. 

since my last reblog of this yet more assyrian heritage has been destroyed, more assyrians have been kidnapped and are being held hostage including many women and children, and several assyrian leaders have been murdered.

this is still happening. as a person of m.e descent raised in an assyrian household, this devastates me. this is a genocide.

By the time I finish this post, it will be illegal in my country

emegustart:

m-goetia:

Hello again friends.

As I wrote in the title, this post will be illegal in Spain in less than an hour. Why? Because in 1 July of 2015 will come into effect the new “Ley de Seguridad Ciudadana”, the “Law of Citizen Security” or how the people of Spain call it LEY MORDAZA, in english GAG LAW.

This law was approved by the government with the oposition of the rest of political parties, the population of Spain and even the EU, the UN and the Greenpeace between many others because is the most agressive attack to the human rights, particularly to the right of freedom of speech.

In less than an hour doing something of the next list will be illegal among many other things:

  • Manifestations around the Congress and the Senate
  • Take photos or videos of the police, even if they are using force against the people. 
  • Stop an eviction
  • The pacific resistance
  • Tweet or spread information about a manifestation in Internet
  • Criticize the spanish monarchy
  • Spread information of the crimes of an accused party (like those participants of the government and politicians who now are being accused of corruption)

But the worst part is that, if you do any of those 44 new guidelines, you will be found guilty no by a proper judge but the government itself under the accusation of administrative offence, with a fine till 600.000 €

In short: this new law search the most agressive way to silence an entire population against one of the worst governments we ever had since the dictatorship of 1939.

NO A LA LEY MORDAZA #NOSOMOSDELITO

—————————— Edit 02:22 a.m. 1/7/2015

First I want to say THANK YOU for all the reblogs and likes this post is having, seriously, is very important for us to know the world is receiving notices about this things. Is amazing to see how people cares. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

Here I add more information:

This post wrote by user lluvia185 is pretty interesting and depicts better some of those guidelines:  http://lluvia185.tumblr.com/post/105000672533/gag-law-soshumanrights

The Twitter hastag #LeyMordaza is now Trending Topic in Spain. Only in spanish I fear but is one of the best sites to view and feel our anger: https://twitter.com/hashtag/LeyMordaza?src=tren

And now how the population have received the new law: with manifestations since minute one of July: http://nosomosdelito.net/convocatoria/2015/06/20/sinmordazas-manifestaciones-contra-las-leyes-mordaza

image

i usually keep this blog art-related only, but this is happening in my country. please spread this.