So when boys want to wear tank tops, it’s okay, but when
I want to do it, it’s indecent and my shoulders are going to
give every boy in a 20-mile radius a boner?if your underage and its a professional environment, wear
professional clothing. women have sexual organs on their
top half, men don’t, don’t you know biology??breasts aren’t sexual organs and neither are shoulders
do everyone a favor staple your hands to your ass
I get what you’re going for here but breasts are very much a sexual organ in many ways and saying otherwise is bad science. As everyone with boobs has probably realized at one point or another in their lives, on average they shouldn’t be nearly as big as they are. Looking at other mammals you’ll notice most of them have significantly less fat deposits in the chest area. No one is quite sure of the specifics but it’s generally agreed that for one reason or another humans evolved to have bigger breasts, and one of the biggest possible reasons for that is to attract mates, since being able to support a well rounded figure suggests health, or at the very least a lack of malnutrition. Most people who are attracted to women, male, female, or what have you, find breasts to be visually pleasing and interesting, they’ve acted as a focus of desire for thousands of years and while that’s a little strange when you think about it logically it is very much part and parcel of attraction. Plus there are way more nerve endings in there then there should be if they were only for nursing, it is technically an erogenous zone that the majority of women can derive pleasure from. While not their first purpose breasts have evolved to be major element of sexual attraction.
Of course you could make a similar, if weaker, argument about men’s chests and we don’t cover those up, and shoulders regardless of gender definitely aren’t censor worthy. Still, a common pair of tatas has design features for things other than baby feeding.